The 4 Property Rule in Real Estate Investing
Portfolio lending is becoming increasing popular. One of the reasons for this is portfolio lending is not restricted to the horrific 4 property rule. Through a portfolio lender, it is possible to acquire a multitude of mortgages. However, those looking to procure loans through entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will run into the 4 property rule wall.
It is obvious that the $750 billion bailout did not do a thing to free up capital. And now the 4 property rule is a slap in the face to all real estate investors. In fact, this particular rule is a complete rejection of the principles that our capitalist society is founded on. In my opinion, the 4 property rule is designed to put real estate investors out of business. Just when the government should be inviting us to participate in the economic recovery.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
This type of rule does very little to help our economy recover. In my opinion, it is a form of Socialism. And, last time I looked we lived in a country founded on Capitalism. So, this rule overall does nothing to improve our situation and in fact the 4 property rule can significantly weaken our economy.
Before the subprime meltdown, investors took advantage of rapidly increasing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. Sometimes, real estate investors purchased huge volumes of properties to resell. The affordable housing they provided had a positive impact on our economy.
If there were no 4 property rule, the sale of of real estate would lead to a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated would lead to increased liquidity. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, affordable housing would be plentiful. With this 4 property rule, none of this is possible. Hopefully, this rule will be overturned so we can return to a free market approach to investment real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
It is obvious that the $750 billion bailout did not do a thing to free up capital. And now the 4 property rule is a slap in the face to all real estate investors. In fact, this particular rule is a complete rejection of the principles that our capitalist society is founded on. In my opinion, the 4 property rule is designed to put real estate investors out of business. Just when the government should be inviting us to participate in the economic recovery.
So, what specifically is the 4 property rule? Essentially, the new rules of conventional lending state that a person will be limited to four financed properties at one time. Again, this is a thoroughly absurd rule that undermines many benefits of real estate investing. Basically, if you are limited to only four financed homes, you can not flip property in vast numbers.
This type of rule does very little to help our economy recover. In my opinion, it is a form of Socialism. And, last time I looked we lived in a country founded on Capitalism. So, this rule overall does nothing to improve our situation and in fact the 4 property rule can significantly weaken our economy.
Before the subprime meltdown, investors took advantage of rapidly increasing real estate values. They would purchase properties at low prices and then sell high. Sometimes, real estate investors purchased huge volumes of properties to resell. The affordable housing they provided had a positive impact on our economy.
If there were no 4 property rule, the sale of of real estate would lead to a number of positive effects. For example, the revenues generated would lead to increased liquidity. It would also generate significant tax revenue to the state and local governments. And, of course, affordable housing would be plentiful. With this 4 property rule, none of this is possible. Hopefully, this rule will be overturned so we can return to a free market approach to investment real estate.
Then again, regardless of whether or not this rule is revoked, portfolio lenders are not restricted to such a rule. If you wish to seek massive financing, a portfolio lender is the lender to visit.
About the Author:
Susan Lassiter-Lyons has been teaching real estate investors all about investor financing since 2002. Her free report, The Death of Real Estate Investing, reveals how to find portfolio lenders nationwide.
posted by Credit Counseling at
6:39 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home